Role transparency
Who treats, what the facilitator provides, who owns the clinical decision — clear on every page.
Medical-tourism agency service
The most critical point in facilitator communication is role clarity: who offers what to the patient, which institution performs the treatment, and where the facilitator's responsibility starts and ends. Ambiguity creates both trust and compliance exposure.
Facilitator certification requires protocols with at least three healthcare institutions in Türkiye. That protocol structure creates a direct consistency obligation in digital communication: the institutions named on the site must match the protocol scope.

Patients often assume the treatment described on a facilitator's site is the facilitator's own service. When it is not written clearly who performs the treatment, what the facilitator provides — coordination, transfer, accommodation, interpretation — and who owns the clinical decision, a dispute over responsibility begins the moment something goes wrong.
Transparent role description does not weaken sales; it produces a professional impression and attracts better-qualified patients.
Healthcare institutions named or implied on the site must be consistent with the protocol scope. Using the logo or name of an institution without a protocol creates both contractual and compliance problems.
The treatment list must equally stay within the authorisation scope of the protocol institutions. An out-of-scope treatment appearing on the site puts the whole chain at risk.
What we check for facilitators
Who treats, what the facilitator provides, who owns the clinical decision — clear on every page.
The institution and treatment list on the site never exceeds protocol scope.
Patient information moving between organisations is bound to a written framework.
Working sequence
Protocol institutions and their authorisation scopes are listed.
Published institution and treatment descriptions compared with scope.
Responsibility boundary and service scope written for every page.
Information transfer between facilitator and institution is defined.
Enquiry, referral and follow-up run on a single record.
Frequently asked questions
Within protocol scope and with the institution's written approval. Using a name or logo without approval creates contractual exposure.
Discount and campaign framing around a medical procedure is problematic under the promotion regulation. A structure describing the service components of a package is safer, subject to your legal function's review.
The legal basis, scope and security measures of the transfer must be written down. Your data protection lead defines that process; the agency makes it visible on the communication side.
Your brand, without hiding who performs the treatment. Transparency is the strongest differentiator in the facilitator model.
International health tourism facilitation requires the certificate issued by USHAŞ. We do not begin promotional work before it is in place.
A number is not required, but any number given must match the protocol reality. An unverifiable figure is the first thing that gets questioned.
Next step
Share your protocol structure and current site and we will start with the consistency check.